Having two StaticInst classes, one nominally ISA dependent and the other ISA
dependent, has not been historically useful and makes the StaticInst class
more complicated that it needs to be. This change merges StaticInstBase into
StaticInst.
This change pulls the instruction decoding machinery (including caches) out of
the StaticInst class and puts it into its own class. This has a few intrinsic
benefits. First, the StaticInst code, which has gotten to be quite large, gets
simpler. Second, the code that handles decode caching is now separated out
into its own component and can be looked at in isolation, making it easier to
understand. I took the opportunity to restructure the code a bit which will
hopefully also help.
Beyond that, this change also lays some ground work for each ISA to have its
own, potentially stateful decode object. We'd be able to include less
contextualizing information in the ExtMachInst objects since that context
would be applied at the decoder. Also, the decoder could "know" ahead of time
that all the instructions it's going to see are going to be, for instance, 64
bit mode, and it will have one less thing to check when it decodes them.
Because the decode caching mechanism has been separated out, it's now possible
to have multiple caches which correspond to different types of decoding
context. Having one cache for each element of the cross product of different
configurations may become prohibitive, so it may be desirable to clear out the
cache when relatively static state changes and not to have one for each
setting.
Because the decode function is no longer universally accessible as a static
member of the StaticInst class, a new function was added to the ThreadContexts
that returns the applicable decode object.
readBytes and writeBytes had the word "bytes" in their names because they
accessed blobs of bytes. This distinguished them from the read and write
functions which handled higher level data types. Because those functions don't
exist any more, this change renames readBytes and writeBytes to more general
names, readMem and writeMem, which reflect the fact that they are how you read
and write memory. This also makes their names more consistent with the
register reading/writing functions, although those are still read and set for
some reason.
The DTB expects the correct PC in the ThreadContext
but how if the memory accesses are speculative? Shouldn't
we send along the requestor's PC to the translate functions?
if a faulting instruction reaches an execution unit,
then ignore it and pass it through the pipeline.
Once we recognize the fault in the graduation unit,
dont allow a second fault to creep in on the same cycle.
Before graduating an instruction, explicitly check fault
by making the fault check it's own separate command
that can be put on an instruction schedule.
remove events in the resource pool that can be called from the CPU event, since the CPU
event is scheduled at the same time at the resource pool event.
----
Also, match the resPool event function names to the cpu event function names
----
only update BTB on a taken branch and update branch predictor w/pcstate from instruction
---
only pay attention to branch predictor updates if the the inst. is in fact a branch
formerly, this was implicit when you accessed the execution unit
or the use-def unit but it's better that this just be something
that a user can specify.
Architectures like SPARC need to read the window pointer
in order to figure out it's register dependence. However,
this may not get updated until after an instruction gets
executed, so now we lazily detect the register dependence
in the EXE stage (execution unit or use_def). This
makes sure we get the mapping after the most current change.
Add a few constants and functions that the InOrder model wants for SPARC.
* * *
sparc: add eaComp function
InOrder separates the address generation from the actual access so give
Sparc that functionality
* * *
sparc: add control flags for branches
branch predictors and other cpu model functions need to know specific information
about branches, so add the necessary flags here
At the same time, rename the trace flags to debug flags since they
have broader usage than simply tracing. This means that
--trace-flags is now --debug-flags and --trace-help is now --debug-help
***
(1): get rid of expandForMT function
MIPS is the only ISA that cares about having a piece of ISA state integrate
multiple threads so add constants for MIPS and relieve the other ISAs from having
to define this. Also, InOrder was the only core that was actively calling
this function
* * *
(2): get rid of corespecific type
The CoreSpecific type was used as a proxy to pass in HW specific params to
a MIPS CPU, but since MIPS FS hasnt been touched for awhile, it makes sense
to not force every other ISA to use CoreSpecific as well use a special
reset function to set it. That probably should go in a PowerOn reset fault
anyway.
Because int and not InstSeqNum was used in a couple of places, you can
overflow the int type and thus get wierd bugs when the sequence number
is negative (or some wierd value)
remove constructors that werent being used (it just gets confusing)
use initialization list for all the variables instead of relying on initVars()
function
-use a pointer to CacheReqPacket instead of PacketPtr so correct destructors
get called on packet deletion
- make sure to delete the packet if the cache blocks the sendTiming request
or for some reason we dont use the packet
- dont overwrite memory requests since in the worst case an instruction will
be replaying a request so no need to keep allocating a new request
- we dont use retryPkt so delete it
- fetch code was split out already, so just assert that this is a memory
reference inst. and that the staticInst is available
keep track of when an instruction needs the execution
behind it to be serialized. Without this, in SE Mode
instructions can execute behind a system call exit().
resources don't need to call getLatency because the latency is already a member
in the class. If there is some type of special case where different instructions
impose a different latency inside a resource then we can revisit this and
add getLatency() back in
each resource has a certain # of requests it can take per cycle. update the #s here
to be more realistic based off of the pipeline width and if the resource needs to
be accessed on multiple cycles
---
need to delete the cache request's data on clearRequest() now that we are recycling
requests
---
fetch unit needs to deallocate the fetch buffer blocks when they are replaced or
squashed.
formerly, to free up bandwidth in a resource, we could just change the pointer in that resource
but at the same time the pipeline stages had visibility to see what happened to a resource request.
Now that we are recycling these requests (to avoid too much dynamic allocation), we can't throw
away the request too early or the pipeline stage gets bad information. Instead, mark when a request
is done with the resource all together and then let the pipeline stage call back to the resource
that it's time to free up the bandwidth for more instructions
*** inteface notes ***
- When an instruction completes and is done in a resource for that cycle, call done()
- When an instruction fails and is done with a resource for that cycle, call done(false)
- When an instruction completes, but isnt finished with a resource, call completed()
- When an instruction fails, but isnt finished with a resource, call completed(false)
* * *
inorder: tlbmiss wakeup bug fix
take away all instances of reqMap in the code and make all references use the built-in
request vectors inside of each resource. The request map was dynamically allocating
a request per instruction. The request vector just allocates N number of requests
during instantiation and then the surrounding code is fixed up to reuse those N requests
***
setRequest() and clearRequest() are the new accessors needed to define a new
request in a resource
we are going to be getting away from creating new resource requests for every
instruction so no more need to keep track of a reqRemoveList and clean it up
every tick
first change in an optimization that will stop InOrder from allocating new memory for every instruction's
request to a resource. This gets expensive since every instruction needs to access ~10 requests before
graduation. Instead, the plan is to allocate just enough resource request objects to satisfy each resource's
bandwidth (e.g. the execution unit would need to allocate 3 resource request objects for a 1-issue pipeline
since on any given cycle it could have 2 read requests and 1 write request) and then let the instructions
contend and reuse those allocated requests. The end result is a smaller memory footprint for the InOrder model
and increased simulation performance
resource skeds are divided into two parts: front end (all insts) and back end (inst. specific)
each of those are implemented as separate lists, so this iterator wraps around
the traditional list iterator so that an instruction can walk it's schedule but seamlessly
transfer from front end to back end when necessary
add a stage scheduler class to replace InstStage in pipeline_traits.cc
use that class to define a default front-end, resource schedule that all
instructions will follow. This will also replace the back end schedule in
pipeline_traits.cc. The reason for adding this is so that we can cache
instruction schedules in the future instead of calling the same function
over/over again as well as constantly dynamically alllocating memory on
every instruction to try to figure out it's schedule
Maintain all information about an instruction's fault in the DynInst object rather
than any cpu-request object. Also, if there is a fault during the execution stage
then just save the fault inside the instruction and trap once the instruction
tries to graduate
Give fetch unit it's own parameterizable fetch buffer to read from. Very inefficient
(architecturally and in simulation) to continually fetch at the granularity of the
wordsize. As expected, the number of fetch memory requests drops dramatically
