Secure and non-secure data can coexist in the cache and therefore the
snoop filter should treat differently packets with secure and non
secure accesses. This patch uses the lower bits of the line address to
keep track of whether the packet is addressing secure memory or not.
Change-Id: I54a5e614dad566a5083582bede86c86896f2c2c1
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
The snoop filter handles requests in two steps which preceed and
follow the call to send the packet downstream. An address mapper could
possibly change the address of the packet when it is sent downstream
breaking the snoop filter assumption that the address is unchanged
Change-Id: Ib2db755e9ebef4f2f7c0169a46b1b11185ffbe79
Reviewed-by: Andreas Sandberg <andreas.sandberg@arm.com>
This patch moves away from using M5_ATTR_OVERRIDE and the m5::hashmap
(and similar) abstractions, as these are no longer needed with gcc 4.7
and clang 3.1 as minimum compiler versions.
This patch changes the tracking of ports in the snoop filter to use
local dense port IDs so that we can have 64 snooping ports (rather
than crossbar slave ports). This is achieved by adding a simple
remapping vector that translates the actal port IDs into the local
slave IDs used in the SnoopMask.
Ultimately this patch allows us to scale to much larger systems
without introducing a hierarchy of crossbars.
This patch adds a snoop filter to the L2XBar. For now we refrain from
globally adding a snoop filter to the SystemXBar, since the latter is
also used in systems without caches. In scenarios without caches the
snoop filter will not see any writeback/clean evicts from the CPU
ports, despite the fact that they are snooping. To avoid inadvertent
use of the snoop filter in these cases we leave it out for now.
A size check is added to the snoop filter, merely to ensure it does
not grow beyond the total capacity of the caches above it. The size
has to be set manually, and a value of 8 MByte is choosen as suitably
high default.
This patch introduces a private member storing the iterator from the
lookupRequest call, such that it can be re-used when the request
eventually finishes. The method previously called updateRequest is
renamed finishRequest to make it more clear that the two functions
must be called together.
This patch adds the functionality to properly track CleanEvicts and
Writebacks in the snoop filter. Previously there were no CleanEvicts, and
Writebacks did not send up snoops to ensure there were no copies in
caches above. Hence a writeback could never erase an entry from the
snoop filter.
When a CleanEvict message reaches a snoop filter, it confirms that the
BLOCK_CACHED flag is not set and resets the bits corresponding to the
CleanEvict address and port it arrived on. If none of the other peer
caches have (or have requested) the block, the snoop filter forwards
the CleanEvict to lower levels of memory. In case of a Writeback
message, the snoop filter checks if the BLOCK_CACHED flag is not set
and only then resets the bits corresponding to the Writeback
address. If any of the other peer caches have (or has requested) the
same block, the snoop filter sets the BLOCK_CACHED flag in the
Writeback before forwarding it to lower levels of memory heirarachy.
This patch changes how the crossbar classes deal with
responses. Instead of forwarding responses directly and burdening the
neighbouring modules in paying for the latency (through the
pkt->headerDelay), we now queue them before sending them.
The coherency protocol is not affected as requests and any snoop
requests/responses are still passed on in zero time. Thus, the
responses end up paying for any header delay accumulated when passing
through the crossbar. Any latency incurred on the request path will be
paid for on the response side, if no other module has dealt with it.
As a result of this patch, responses are returned at a later
point. This affects the number of outstanding transactions, and quite
a few regressions see an impact in blocking due to no MSHRs, increased
cache-miss latencies, etc.
Going forward we should be able to use the same concept also for snoop
responses, and any request that is not an express snoop.
Adds a simple access counter for requests and snoops for the snoop filter and
also classifies hits based on whether a single other holder existed or whether
multiple shares held the line.
This is a first cut at a simple snoop filter that tracks presence of lines in
the caches "above" it. The snoop filter can be applied at any given cache
hierarchy and will then handle the caches above it appropriately; there is no
need to use this only in the last-level bus.
This design currently has some limitations: missing stats, no notion of clean
evictions (these will not update the underlying snoop filter, because they are
not sent from the evicting cache down), no notion of capacity for the snoop
filter and thus no need for invalidations caused by capacity pressure in the
snoop filter. These are planned to be added on top with future change sets.
