Received: from 128.140.1.1 by ee.lbl.gov for (8.6.9/1.43r) id PAA03966; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 15:03:57 -0800 Received: from larry-le0.cc.emory.edu by emoryu1.cc.emory.edu (5.65/Emory_cc.4.0.1) via SMTP id AA24158 ; Tue, 24 Jan 95 17:18:18 -0500 From: tkane01@unix.cc.emory.edu (Terrence O Kane) Received: by larry.cc.emory.edu (5.0) id AA21979; Tue, 24 Jan 1995 17:17:40 -0500 Message-Id: <9501242217.AA21979@larry.cc.emory.edu> Subject: Re: Beta test for DOS To: vern@ee.lbl.gov (Vern Paxson) Date: Tue, 24 Jan 1995 17:17:38 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <199501232138.NAA11430@daffy.ee.lbl.gov> from "Vern Paxson" at Jan 23, 95 01:38:02 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 5792 Vern, I've made flex 2.5.0.6 successfully with no changes to the source code at all. I'm including the Borland 4.02 makefile and config.h at the end of this message. When you're ready for release, I'll be happy to take care of getting the appropriate archive files up to Simtel if you wish. I have not used this version for any of my "work-related" scanners yet, but have run the fastwc benchmark. The compiles were for large memory model and optimization for fastest possible code. The test machine was a Pentium-90 (hey! timing output was integer!) with enhanced IDE on a PCI bus and no file system caching. I ran the test on two different input files. (Times are in seconds.) The first input was a typical postscript file concatenated 10 times; by typical, I mean that there were relatively few spaces, lots of lines with no space, using lots of parentheses. lines words characters 91200 356260 5889240 mywc 8.89 wc1s 15.22 default wc1 10.82 -Cf wc2 10.16 -Cf wc3 9.17 -Cf wc4 9.22 -Cf wc5 10.98 -Cf The second test run was on a file that consisted of 20 concatenations of 'misc/flex.man'. lines words characters 69960 305140 2399960 mywc 4.01 wc1s 6.87 wc1 5.32 wc2 4.95 wc3 4.12 wc4 4.12 wc5 5.05 [[Makefile and config.h moved to separate files -VP]]