syncing, for instance) if blocks are unwritable. This could happen if:
. write goes beyond device boundary to a block device
. write is done for a complete block or more; thus the
block is not retrieved first (at which point it would be noticed
it doesn't exist), but the buffer is simply allocated
. at write time, the device i/o doesn't succeed, but rw_scattered
doesn't understand this and loops forever trying to get the block
written.
Currently, if no blocks can be written, the loop aborts, leaving all
buffers intact but potentially dirty. When invalidate() is called on the
device, the buffers will disappear (even if dirty). Same story for if
the buffer is removed due to rmed from lru chain. There's not much we
can do about this, however - we can't keep these blocks around, forever
occupying a buffer in the buffer cache.
The second part of the solution is not to let unwritable buffers be
created in the first place. How to do this, however, without doing a
wasteful read first?
It looks like this code was in 2.0.4 too.
Added interface to select() for pipes (also named pipes), and select()
stubs for regular files.
Added timer library in FS that select() is the first customer of.
This is unfinished, but committed anyway to get a new release out to
Al and testers.
names. All system processes can now either use panic() or report() from
libutils, or redefine their own function. Assertions are done via the standard
<assert.h> functionality.
