VFS: fix pipe resumption delay bug
Commit 723e513
erroneously removed a yield() call from VFS which was
necessary to get resumed pipe read/write threads to run before VFS
blocks on receive(). The removal caused those threads to run only
once VFS received another message, effectively slowing down activity
on pipes to a crawl in some cases.
Instead of readding the yield() call, this patch restructures the
get_work() code to go back through the main message loop even when no
new work is received, thus ensuring that newly started threads are
always activated without requiring a special case.
This fixes #65.
Change-Id: I59b7fb9e403d87dba1a5deecb04539cc37517742
This commit is contained in:
parent
e1e2bc96d2
commit
5055c7ea51
1 changed files with 19 additions and 23 deletions
|
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void do_init_root(void);
|
|||
static void handle_work(void (*func)(void));
|
||||
static void reply(message *m_out, endpoint_t whom, int result);
|
||||
|
||||
static void get_work(void);
|
||||
static int get_work(void);
|
||||
static void service_pm(void);
|
||||
static int unblock(struct fproc *rfp);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -74,7 +74,12 @@ int main(void)
|
|||
yield_all(); /* let other threads run */
|
||||
self = NULL;
|
||||
send_work();
|
||||
get_work();
|
||||
|
||||
/* The get_work() function returns TRUE if we have a new message to
|
||||
* process. It returns FALSE if it spawned other thread activities.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!get_work())
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
transid = TRNS_GET_ID(m_in.m_type);
|
||||
if (IS_VFS_FS_TRANSID(transid)) {
|
||||
|
@ -476,27 +481,22 @@ void thread_cleanup(void)
|
|||
/*===========================================================================*
|
||||
* get_work *
|
||||
*===========================================================================*/
|
||||
static void get_work()
|
||||
static int get_work(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Normally wait for new input. However, if 'reviving' is
|
||||
* nonzero, a suspended process must be awakened.
|
||||
/* Normally wait for new input. However, if 'reviving' is nonzero, a
|
||||
* suspended process must be awakened. Return TRUE if there is a message to
|
||||
* process (usually newly received, but possibly a resumed request), or FALSE
|
||||
* if a thread for other activities has been spawned instead.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int r, found_one, proc_p;
|
||||
int r, proc_p;
|
||||
register struct fproc *rp;
|
||||
|
||||
while (reviving != 0) {
|
||||
found_one = FALSE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (reviving != 0) {
|
||||
/* Find a suspended process. */
|
||||
for (rp = &fproc[0]; rp < &fproc[NR_PROCS]; rp++)
|
||||
if (rp->fp_pid != PID_FREE && (rp->fp_flags & FP_REVIVED)) {
|
||||
found_one = TRUE; /* Found a suspended process */
|
||||
if (unblock(rp))
|
||||
return; /* So main loop can process job */
|
||||
send_work();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (rp->fp_pid != PID_FREE && (rp->fp_flags & FP_REVIVED))
|
||||
return unblock(rp); /* So main loop can process job */
|
||||
|
||||
if (!found_one) /* Consistency error */
|
||||
panic("VFS: get_work couldn't revive anyone");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -510,11 +510,6 @@ static void get_work()
|
|||
if (proc_p < 0 || proc_p >= NR_PROCS) fp = NULL;
|
||||
else fp = &fproc[proc_p];
|
||||
|
||||
if (m_in.m_type == EDEADSRCDST) {
|
||||
printf("VFS: failed ipc_sendrec\n");
|
||||
return; /* Failed 'ipc_sendrec' */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Negative who_p is never used to access the fproc array. Negative
|
||||
* numbers (kernel tasks) are treated in a special way.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -536,8 +531,9 @@ static void get_work()
|
|||
fproc[who_p].fp_endpoint, who_e);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return TRUE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* NOTREACHED */
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*===========================================================================*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue