2005-05-02 15:01:42 +02:00
|
|
|
.TH DHRYSTONE 1
|
|
|
|
.SH NAME
|
|
|
|
dhrystone \- integer benchmark
|
|
|
|
.SH SYNOPSIS
|
|
|
|
\fBdhrystone\fR
|
|
|
|
.br
|
|
|
|
.de FL
|
|
|
|
.TP
|
|
|
|
\\fB\\$1\\fR
|
|
|
|
\\$2
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
.de EX
|
|
|
|
.TP 20
|
|
|
|
\\fB\\$1\\fR
|
|
|
|
# \\$2
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
.SH EXAMPLES
|
2012-03-31 23:44:29 +02:00
|
|
|
.TP 20
|
|
|
|
.B dhrystone
|
|
|
|
# Run the dhrystone benchmark
|
2005-05-02 15:01:42 +02:00
|
|
|
.SH DESCRIPTION
|
|
|
|
.PP
|
|
|
|
Many years ago, a floating-point benchmark called \fIwhetstone\fR was
|
|
|
|
popular for benchmarking FORTRAN programs.
|
|
|
|
Nowadays, an integer benchmark called \fIdhrystone\fR is widely used
|
|
|
|
for benchmarking UNIX systems.
|
|
|
|
This is it.
|
|
|
|
Be warned, however, that \fIdhrystone\fR is entirely CPU bound, and
|
|
|
|
goes blindingly fast on machines with high-speed caches.
|
|
|
|
Although this is a good measure for programs that spend most of their
|
|
|
|
time in some inner loop, it is a poor benchmark for I/O bound applications.
|