This patch moves all flow control, arbitration and state information
into a bus layer. The layer is thus responsible for all the state
transitions, and for keeping hold of the retry list. Consequently the
layer is also responsible for the draining.
With this change, the non-coherent and coherent bus are given a single
layer to avoid changing any temporal behaviour, but the patch opens up
for adding more layers.
This patch adds a state enum and member variable in the bus, tracking
the bus state, thus eliminating the need for tickNextIdle and inRetry,
and fixing an issue that allowed the bus to be occupied by multiple
packets at once (hopefully it also makes it easier to understand the
code).
The bus, in its current form, uses tickNextIdle and inRetry to keep
track of the state of the bus. However, it only updates tickNextIdle
_after_ forwarding a packet using sendTiming, and the result is that
the bus is still seen as idle, and a module that receives the packet
and starts transmitting new packets in zero time will still see the
bus as idle (and this is done by a number of DMA devices). The issue
can also be seen in isOccupied where the bus calls reschedule on an
event instead of schedule.
This patch addresses the problem by marking the bus as _not_ idle
already by the time we conclude that the bus is not occupied and we
will deal with the packet.
As a result of not allowing multiple packets to occupy the bus, some
regressions have slight changes in their statistics. A separate patch
updates these accordingly.
Further ahead, a follow-on patch will introduce a separate state
variable for request/responses/snoop responses, and thus implement a
split request/response bus with separate flow control for the
different message types (even further ahead it will introduce a
multi-layer bus).
This patch adds isSnooping to the slave port, and thus avoids going
through getMasterPort to be able to ask the master. Over the course of
the next few patches, all getMasterPort/getSlavePort in Port and
MemObject are to be protocol agnostic, and the snooping is part of the
protocol layer.
The function is already present on the master port, where it is
implemented by the module itself, e.g. a cache. On the slave side, it
is merely asking the connected master port. The same name is used by
both functions despite their difference in behaviour. The initial
design used isMasterSnooping on the slave port side, but the more
verbose function name was later changed.
This patch introduces a class hierarchy of buses, a non-coherent one,
and a coherent one, splitting the existing bus functionality. By doing
so it also enables further specialisation of the two types of buses.
A non-coherent bus connects a number of non-snooping masters and
slaves, and routes the request and response packets based on the
address. The request packets issued by the master connected to a
non-coherent bus could still snoop in caches attached to a coherent
bus, as is the case with the I/O bus and memory bus in most system
configurations. No snoops will, however, reach any master on the
non-coherent bus itself. The non-coherent bus can be used as a
template for modelling PCI, PCIe, and non-coherent AMBA and OCP buses,
and is typically used for the I/O buses.
A coherent bus connects a number of (potentially) snooping masters and
slaves, and routes the request and response packets based on the
address, and also forwards all requests to the snoopers and deals with
the snoop responses. The coherent bus can be used as a template for
modelling QPI, HyperTransport, ACE and coherent OCP buses, and is
typically used for the L1-to-L2 buses and as the main system
interconnect.
The configuration scripts are updated to use a NoncoherentBus for all
peripheral and I/O buses.
A bit of minor tidying up has also been done.
--HG--
rename : src/mem/bus.cc => src/mem/coherent_bus.cc
rename : src/mem/bus.hh => src/mem/coherent_bus.hh
rename : src/mem/bus.cc => src/mem/noncoherent_bus.cc
rename : src/mem/bus.hh => src/mem/noncoherent_bus.hh
