mem: Explicitly check MSHR snoops for cases not dealt with
Add a sanity check to make it explicit that we currently do not allow an I/O coherent agent to directly issue writes into the coherent part of the memory system (it has to go via a cache, and get transformed into a read ex, upgrade or invalidation).
This commit is contained in:
parent
f6525ff221
commit
f5c4a45889
1 changed files with 9 additions and 0 deletions
9
src/mem/cache/mshr.cc
vendored
9
src/mem/cache/mshr.cc
vendored
|
@ -323,6 +323,15 @@ MSHR::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, Counter _order)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
DPRINTF(Cache, "%s for %s addr %#llx size %d\n", __func__,
|
DPRINTF(Cache, "%s for %s addr %#llx size %d\n", __func__,
|
||||||
pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(), pkt->getSize());
|
pkt->cmdString(), pkt->getAddr(), pkt->getSize());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
// when we snoop packets the needsExclusive and isInvalidate flags
|
||||||
|
// should always be the same, however, this assumes that we never
|
||||||
|
// snoop writes as they are currently not marked as invalidations
|
||||||
|
panic_if(pkt->needsExclusive() != pkt->isInvalidate(),
|
||||||
|
"%s got snoop %s to addr %#llx where needsExclusive, "
|
||||||
|
"does not match isInvalidate", name(), pkt->cmdString(),
|
||||||
|
pkt->getAddr());
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!inService || (pkt->isExpressSnoop() && downstreamPending)) {
|
if (!inService || (pkt->isExpressSnoop() && downstreamPending)) {
|
||||||
// Request has not been issued yet, or it's been issued
|
// Request has not been issued yet, or it's been issued
|
||||||
// locally but is buffered unissued at some downstream cache
|
// locally but is buffered unissued at some downstream cache
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue