cpu: Introduce sanity checks when switching between CPUs

This patch introduces the following sanity checks when switching
between CPUs:

 * Check that the set of new and old CPUs do not overlap. Having an
   overlap between the set of new CPUs and the set of old CPUs is
   currently not supported. Doing such a switch used to result in the
   following assertion error:
     BaseCPU::takeOverFrom(BaseCPU*): \
       Assertion `!new_itb_port->isConnected()' failed.

 * Check that all new CPUs are in the switched out state.

 * Check that all old CPUs are in the switched in state.
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Sandberg 2013-01-07 13:05:44 -05:00
parent 901258c22b
commit a7e0cbeb36
4 changed files with 28 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ class BaseCPU(MemObject):
code('''
void switchOut();
void takeOverFrom(BaseCPU *cpu);
bool switchedOut();
''')
def takeOverFrom(self, old_cpu):

View file

@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ BaseCPU::BaseCPU(Params *p, bool is_checker)
_instMasterId(p->system->getMasterId(name() + ".inst")),
_dataMasterId(p->system->getMasterId(name() + ".data")),
_taskId(ContextSwitchTaskId::Unknown), _pid(Request::invldPid),
_switchedOut(p->defer_registration),
interrupts(p->interrupts), profileEvent(NULL),
numThreads(p->numThreads), system(p->system)
{
@ -356,6 +357,8 @@ BaseCPU::findContext(ThreadContext *tc)
void
BaseCPU::switchOut()
{
assert(!_switchedOut);
_switchedOut = true;
if (profileEvent && profileEvent->scheduled())
deschedule(profileEvent);
}
@ -365,8 +368,11 @@ BaseCPU::takeOverFrom(BaseCPU *oldCPU)
{
assert(threadContexts.size() == oldCPU->threadContexts.size());
assert(_cpuId == oldCPU->cpuId());
assert(_switchedOut);
assert(oldCPU != this);
_pid = oldCPU->getPid();
_taskId = oldCPU->taskId();
_switchedOut = false;
ThreadID size = threadContexts.size();
for (ThreadID i = 0; i < size; ++i) {

View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2011 ARM Limited
* Copyright (c) 2011-2012 ARM Limited
* All rights reserved
*
* The license below extends only to copyright in the software and shall
@ -114,6 +114,9 @@ class BaseCPU : public MemObject
* used to generate a taskId */
uint32_t _pid;
/** Is the CPU switched out or active? */
bool _switchedOut;
/**
* Define a base class for the CPU ports (instruction and data)
* that is refined in the subclasses. This class handles the
@ -320,6 +323,13 @@ class BaseCPU : public MemObject
*/
virtual void takeOverFrom(BaseCPU *cpu);
/**
* Determine if the CPU is switched out.
*
* @return True if the CPU is switched out, false otherwise.
*/
bool switchedOut() const { return _switchedOut; }
/**
* Number of threads we're actually simulating (<= SMT_MAX_THREADS).
* This is a constant for the duration of the simulation.

View file

@ -228,11 +228,21 @@ def switchCpus(cpuList):
if not isinstance(item, tuple) or len(item) != 2:
raise RuntimeError, "List must have tuples of (oldCPU,newCPU)"
old_cpu_set = set([old_cpu for old_cpu, new_cpu in cpuList])
for old_cpu, new_cpu in cpuList:
if not isinstance(old_cpu, objects.BaseCPU):
raise TypeError, "%s is not of type BaseCPU" % old_cpu
if not isinstance(new_cpu, objects.BaseCPU):
raise TypeError, "%s is not of type BaseCPU" % new_cpu
if new_cpu in old_cpu_set:
raise RuntimeError, \
"New CPU (%s) is in the list of old CPUs." % (old_cpu,)
if not new_cpu.switchedOut():
raise RuntimeError, \
"New CPU (%s) is already active." % (new_cpu,)
if old_cpu.switchedOut():
raise RuntimeError, \
"Old CPU (%s) is inactive." % (new_cpu,)
# Now all of the CPUs are ready to be switched out
for old_cpu, new_cpu in cpuList: