sanchayanmaity/gem5
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mem: Use FromCache attribute in snoop filter allocation

Browse source 
This patch improves the snoop filter allocation decisions by not only
looking at whether a port is snooping or not, but also if the packet
actually came from a cache. The issue with only looking at isSnooping
is that the CPU ports, for example, are snooping, but not actually
caching. Previously we ended up incorrectly allocating entries in
systems without caches (such as the atomic and timing quick
regressions). Eventually these misguided allocations caused the snoop
filter to panic due to an excessive size.

On the request path we now include the fromCache check on the packet
itself, and for responses we check if we actually have a snoop-filter
entry.

Change-Id: Idd2dbc4f00c7e07d331e9a02658aee30d0350d7e
Reviewed-by: Nikos Nikoleris <nikos.nikoleris@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Gutierrez <anthony.gutierrez@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Hansson 2016-08-12 14:11:45 +01:00
parent 721efa4d09
commit a23e914519
1 changed files with 19 additions and 13 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

32
src/mem/snoop_filter.cc
View file

@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013-2015 ARM Limited
* Copyright (c) 2013-2016 ARM Limited
* All rights reserved
*
* The license below extends only to copyright in the software and shall
@ -65,9 +65,9 @@ SnoopFilter::lookupRequest(const Packet* cpkt, const SlavePort& slave_port)
DPRINTF(SnoopFilter, "%s: packet src %s addr 0x%x cmd %s\n",
__func__, slave_port.name(), cpkt->getAddr(), cpkt->cmdString());
// Ultimately we should check if the packet came from an
// allocating source, not just if the port is snooping
bool allocate = !cpkt->req->isUncacheable() && slave_port.isSnooping();
// check if the packet came from a cache
bool allocate = !cpkt->req->isUncacheable() && slave_port.isSnooping() &&
cpkt->fromCache();
Addr line_addr = cpkt->getBlockAddr(linesize);
SnoopMask req_port = portToMask(slave_port);
reqLookupResult = cachedLocations.find(line_addr);
@ -235,11 +235,12 @@ SnoopFilter::updateSnoopResponse(const Packet* cpkt,
assert(cpkt->isResponse());
assert(cpkt->cacheResponding());
// Ultimately we should check if the packet came from an
// allocating source, not just if the port is snooping
bool allocate = !cpkt->req->isUncacheable() && req_port.isSnooping();
if (!allocate)
// if this snoop response is due to an uncacheable request, or is
// being turned into a normal response, there is nothing more to
// do
if (cpkt->req->isUncacheable() || !req_port.isSnooping()) {
return;
}
Addr line_addr = cpkt->getBlockAddr(linesize);
SnoopMask rsp_mask = portToMask(rsp_port);
@ -268,6 +269,7 @@ SnoopFilter::updateSnoopResponse(const Packet* cpkt,
sf_item.holder = 0;
}
assert(!cpkt->isWriteback());
// @todo Deal with invalidating responses
sf_item.holder |= req_mask;
sf_item.requested &= ~req_mask;
assert(sf_item.requested | sf_item.holder);
@ -319,15 +321,19 @@ SnoopFilter::updateResponse(const Packet* cpkt, const SlavePort& slave_port)
assert(cpkt->isResponse());
// Ultimately we should check if the packet came from an
// allocating source, not just if the port is snooping
bool allocate = !cpkt->req->isUncacheable() && slave_port.isSnooping();
if (!allocate)
// we only allocate if the packet actually came from a cache, but
// start by checking if the port is snooping
if (cpkt->req->isUncacheable() || !slave_port.isSnooping())
return;
// next check if we actually allocated an entry
Addr line_addr = cpkt->getBlockAddr(linesize);
auto sf_it = cachedLocations.find(line_addr);
if (sf_it == cachedLocations.end())
return;
SnoopMask slave_mask = portToMask(slave_port);
SnoopItem& sf_item = cachedLocations[line_addr];
SnoopItem& sf_item = sf_it->second;
DPRINTF(SnoopFilter, "%s: old SF value %x.%x\n",
__func__, sf_item.requested, sf_item.holder);