mem: Filter cache snoops based on address ranges
This patch adds a filter to the cache to drop snoop requests that are not for a range covered by the cache. This fixes an issue observed when multiple caches are placed in parallel, covering different address ranges. Without this patch, all the caches will forward the snoop upwards, when only one should do so.
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf2f178f85
commit
969b436243
1 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
15
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
vendored
15
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
vendored
|
@ -1475,10 +1475,23 @@ Cache<TagStore>::recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt)
|
|||
// Snoops shouldn't happen when bypassing caches
|
||||
assert(!system->bypassCaches());
|
||||
|
||||
// check if the packet is for an address range covered by this
|
||||
// cache, partly to not waste time looking for it, but also to
|
||||
// ensure that we only forward the snoop upwards if it is within
|
||||
// our address ranges
|
||||
bool in_range = false;
|
||||
for (AddrRangeList::const_iterator r = addrRanges.begin();
|
||||
r != addrRanges.end(); ++r) {
|
||||
if (r->contains(pkt->getAddr())) {
|
||||
in_range = true;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Note that some deferred snoops don't have requests, since the
|
||||
// original access may have already completed
|
||||
if ((pkt->req && pkt->req->isUncacheable()) ||
|
||||
pkt->cmd == MemCmd::Writeback) {
|
||||
pkt->cmd == MemCmd::Writeback || !in_range) {
|
||||
//Can't get a hit on an uncacheable address
|
||||
//Revisit this for multi level coherence
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue