From 5b36cf623cd065eea4f7b5e8b892dc904c030d56 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Hansson Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 09:14:12 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] MEM: Add a snooping DMA port subclass for table walker This patch makes the (device) DmaPort non-snooping and removes the recvSnoop constructor parameter and instead introduces a SnoopingDmaPort subclass for the ARM table walker. Functionality is unchanged, as are the stats, and the patch merely clarifies that the normal DMA ports are not snooping (although they may issue requests that are snooped by others, as done with PCI, PCIe, AMBA4 ACE etc). Currently this port is declared in the ARM table walker as it is not used anywhere else. If other ports were to have similar behaviour it could be moved in a future patch. --- src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc | 2 +- src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- src/dev/io_device.cc | 7 +++---- src/dev/io_device.hh | 27 +------------------------ 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc b/src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc index 591c16747..dfb406543 100644 --- a/src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc +++ b/src/arch/arm/table_walker.cc @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ using namespace ArmISA; TableWalker::TableWalker(const Params *p) : MemObject(p), port(this, params()->sys, params()->min_backoff, - params()->max_backoff, true), + params()->max_backoff), tlb(NULL), currState(NULL), pending(false), masterId(p->sys->getMasterId(name())), doL1DescEvent(this), doL2DescEvent(this), doProcessEvent(this) diff --git a/src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh b/src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh index a6ff2585b..36adc8a82 100644 --- a/src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh +++ b/src/arch/arm/table_walker.hh @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ /* - * Copyright (c) 2010 ARM Limited + * Copyright (c) 2010-2012 ARM Limited * All rights reserved * * The license below extends only to copyright in the software and shall @@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ #include "sim/eventq.hh" #include "sim/fault_fwd.hh" -class DmaPort; class ThreadContext; namespace ArmISA { @@ -260,6 +259,40 @@ class TableWalker : public MemObject }; + protected: + + /** + * A snooping DMA port that currently does nothing besides + * extending the DMA port to accept snoops without complaining. + */ + class SnoopingDmaPort : public DmaPort + { + + protected: + + virtual void recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt) + { } + + virtual Tick recvAtomicSnoop(PacketPtr pkt) + { return 0; } + + virtual void recvFunctionalSnoop(PacketPtr pkt) + { } + + virtual bool isSnooping() const { return true; } + + public: + + /** + * A snooping DMA port merely calls the construtor of the DMA + * port. + */ + SnoopingDmaPort(MemObject *dev, System *s, Tick min_backoff, + Tick max_backoff) : + DmaPort(dev, s, min_backoff, max_backoff) + { } + }; + struct WalkerState //: public SimObject { /** Thread context that we're doing the walk for */ @@ -329,7 +362,7 @@ class TableWalker : public MemObject /** Port to issue translation requests from */ - DmaPort port; + SnoopingDmaPort port; /** TLB that is initiating these table walks */ TLB *tlb; diff --git a/src/dev/io_device.cc b/src/dev/io_device.cc index eb799f688..83d3af095 100644 --- a/src/dev/io_device.cc +++ b/src/dev/io_device.cc @@ -120,13 +120,12 @@ BasicPioDevice::getAddrRanges() } -DmaPort::DmaPort(MemObject *dev, System *s, Tick min_backoff, Tick max_backoff, - bool recv_snoops) - : MasterPort(dev->name() + "-dmaport", dev), device(dev), sys(s), +DmaPort::DmaPort(MemObject *dev, System *s, Tick min_backoff, Tick max_backoff) + : MasterPort(dev->name() + "-dma", dev), device(dev), sys(s), masterId(s->getMasterId(dev->name())), pendingCount(0), actionInProgress(0), drainEvent(NULL), backoffTime(0), minBackoffDelay(min_backoff), - maxBackoffDelay(max_backoff), inRetry(false), recvSnoops(recv_snoops), + maxBackoffDelay(max_backoff), inRetry(false), backoffEvent(this) { } diff --git a/src/dev/io_device.hh b/src/dev/io_device.hh index 99b207595..0e6556a50 100644 --- a/src/dev/io_device.hh +++ b/src/dev/io_device.hh @@ -143,34 +143,10 @@ class DmaPort : public MasterPort * it is that it's sending. */ bool inRetry; - /** Port accesses a cache which requires snooping */ - bool recvSnoops; - virtual bool recvTimingResp(PacketPtr pkt); - virtual void recvTimingSnoopReq(PacketPtr pkt) - { - if (!recvSnoops) - panic("%s was not expecting a snoop\n", name()); - } - - virtual Tick recvAtomicSnoop(PacketPtr pkt) - { - if (!recvSnoops) - panic("%s was not expecting a snoop\n", name()); - return 0; - } - - virtual void recvFunctionalSnoop(PacketPtr pkt) - { - if (!recvSnoops) - panic("%s was not expecting a snoop\n", name()); - } - virtual void recvRetry() ; - virtual bool isSnooping() const { return recvSnoops; } - void queueDma(PacketPtr pkt, bool front = false); void sendDma(); @@ -178,8 +154,7 @@ class DmaPort : public MasterPort EventWrapper backoffEvent; public: - DmaPort(MemObject *dev, System *s, Tick min_backoff, Tick max_backoff, - bool recv_snoops = false); + DmaPort(MemObject *dev, System *s, Tick min_backoff, Tick max_backoff); void dmaAction(Packet::Command cmd, Addr addr, int size, Event *event, uint8_t *data, Tick delay, Request::Flags flag = 0);