mem: Assume all dynamic packet data is array allocated

This patch simplifies how we deal with dynamically allocated data in
the packet, always assuming that it is array allocated, and hence
should be array deallocated (delete[] as opposed to delete). The only
uses of dataDynamic was in the Ruby testers.

The ARRAY_DATA flag in the packet is removed accordingly. No
defragmentation of the flags is done at this point, leaving a gap in
the bit masks.

As the last part the patch, it renames dataDynamicArray to dataDynamic.

src/cpu/minor/lsq.cc

@@ -1558,7 +1558,7 @@ makePacketForRequest(Request &request, bool isLoad,
     if (isLoad)
         ret->allocate();
     else
-        ret->dataDynamicArray(data);
+        ret->dataDynamic(data);
 
     return ret;
 }

src/cpu/o3/fetch_impl.hh

@@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ DefaultFetch<Impl>::finishTranslation(const Fault &fault, RequestPtr mem_req)
 
         // Build packet here.
         PacketPtr data_pkt = new Packet(mem_req, MemCmd::ReadReq);
-        data_pkt->dataDynamicArray(new uint8_t[fetchBufferSize]);
+        data_pkt->dataDynamic(new uint8_t[fetchBufferSize]);
 
         fetchBufferPC[tid] = fetchBufferBlockPC;
         fetchBufferValid[tid] = false;

src/cpu/simple/timing.cc

@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ TimingSimpleCPU::sendData(RequestPtr req, uint8_t *data, uint64_t *res,
 {
     PacketPtr pkt;
     buildPacket(pkt, req, read);
-    pkt->dataDynamicArray<uint8_t>(data);
+    pkt->dataDynamic<uint8_t>(data);
     if (req->getFlags().isSet(Request::NO_ACCESS)) {
         assert(!dcache_pkt);
         pkt->makeResponse();
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@ TimingSimpleCPU::buildSplitPacket(PacketPtr &pkt1, PacketPtr &pkt2,
     req->setPhys(req1->getPaddr(), req->getSize(), req1->getFlags(), dataMasterId());
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, pkt1->cmd.responseCommand());
 
-    pkt->dataDynamicArray<uint8_t>(data);
+    pkt->dataDynamic<uint8_t>(data);
     pkt1->dataStatic<uint8_t>(data);
     pkt2->dataStatic<uint8_t>(data + req1->getSize());
 

src/cpu/testers/directedtest/InvalidateGenerator.cc

@@ -76,9 +76,7 @@ InvalidateGenerator::initiate()
     } else {
         panic("initiate was unexpectedly called\n");
     }
-    uint8_t* dummyData = new uint8_t;
+    pkt->allocate();
-    *dummyData = 0;
-    pkt->dataDynamic(dummyData);
 
     if (port->sendTimingReq(pkt)) {
         DPRINTF(DirectedTest, "initiating request - successful\n");

src/cpu/testers/directedtest/SeriesRequestGenerator.cc

@@ -69,9 +69,7 @@ SeriesRequestGenerator::initiate()
     }
 
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, cmd);
-    uint8_t* dummyData = new uint8_t;
+    pkt->allocate();
-    *dummyData = 0;
-    pkt->dataDynamic(dummyData);
 
     if (port->sendTimingReq(pkt)) {
         DPRINTF(DirectedTest, "initiating request - successful\n");

src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.cc

@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ MemTest::tick()
                 blockAddr(req->getPaddr()), *result);
 
         PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, MemCmd::ReadReq);
-        pkt->dataDynamicArray(new uint8_t[req->getSize()]);
+        pkt->dataDynamic(new uint8_t[req->getSize()]);
         MemTestSenderState *state = new MemTestSenderState(result);
         pkt->senderState = state;
 
@@ -349,7 +349,7 @@ MemTest::tick()
 
         PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, MemCmd::WriteReq);
         uint8_t *pkt_data = new uint8_t[req->getSize()];
-        pkt->dataDynamicArray(pkt_data);
+        pkt->dataDynamic(pkt_data);
         memcpy(pkt_data, &data, req->getSize());
         MemTestSenderState *state = new MemTestSenderState(result);
         pkt->senderState = state;

src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.cc

@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ NetworkTest::generatePkt()
             destination, req->getPaddr());
 
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, requestType);
-    pkt->dataDynamicArray(new uint8_t[req->getSize()]);
+    pkt->dataDynamic(new uint8_t[req->getSize()]);
     pkt->senderState = NULL;
 
     sendPkt(pkt);

src/cpu/testers/rubytest/Check.cc

@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ Check::initiatePrefetch()
     // despite the oddity of the 0 size (questionable if this should
     // even be allowed), a prefetch is still a read and as such needs
     // a place to store the result
-    uint8_t *data = new uint8_t;
+    uint8_t *data = new uint8_t[1];
     pkt->dataDynamic(data);
 
     // push the subblock onto the sender state.  The sequencer will
@@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ Check::initiateAction()
     // }
 
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, cmd);
-    uint8_t *writeData = new uint8_t;
+    uint8_t *writeData = new uint8_t[1];
     *writeData = m_value + m_store_count;
     pkt->dataDynamic(writeData);
 
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@ Check::initiateCheck()
     req->setThreadContext(index, 0);
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, MemCmd::ReadReq);
     uint8_t *dataArray = new uint8_t[CHECK_SIZE];
-    pkt->dataDynamicArray(dataArray);
+    pkt->dataDynamic(dataArray);
 
     // push the subblock onto the sender state.  The sequencer will
     // update the subblock on the return

src/cpu/testers/traffic_gen/generators.cc

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ BaseGen::getPacket(Addr addr, unsigned size, const MemCmd& cmd,
     PacketPtr pkt = new Packet(req, cmd);
 
     uint8_t* pkt_data = new uint8_t[req->getSize()];
-    pkt->dataDynamicArray(pkt_data);
+    pkt->dataDynamic(pkt_data);
 
     if (cmd.isWrite()) {
         memset(pkt_data, 0xA, req->getSize());

src/mem/packet.hh

@@ -247,11 +247,9 @@ class Packet : public Printable
     /// when the packet is destroyed?
     static const FlagsType STATIC_DATA            = 0x00001000;
     /// The data pointer points to a value that should be freed when
-    /// the packet is destroyed.
+    /// the packet is destroyed. The pointer is assumed to be pointing
+    /// to an array, and delete [] is consequently called
     static const FlagsType DYNAMIC_DATA           = 0x00002000;
-    /// the data pointer points to an array (thus delete []) needs to
-    /// be called on it rather than simply delete.
-    static const FlagsType ARRAY_DATA             = 0x00004000;
     /// suppress the error if this packet encounters a functional
     /// access failure.
     static const FlagsType SUPPRESS_FUNC_ERROR    = 0x00008000;
@@ -813,7 +811,7 @@ class Packet : public Printable
     void
     dataStatic(T *p)
     {
-        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA));
+        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA));
         data = (PacketDataPtr)p;
         flags.set(STATIC_DATA);
     }
@@ -830,7 +828,7 @@ class Packet : public Printable
     void
     dataStaticConst(const T *p)
     {
-        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA));
+        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA));
         data = const_cast<PacketDataPtr>(p);
         flags.set(STATIC_DATA);
     }
@@ -841,22 +839,9 @@ class Packet : public Printable
      */
     template <typename T>
     void
-    dataDynamicArray(T *p)
-    {
-        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA));
-        data = (PacketDataPtr)p;
-        flags.set(DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA);
-    }
-
-    /**
-     * set the data pointer to a value that should have delete called
-     * on it.
-     */
-    template <typename T>
-    void
     dataDynamic(T *p)
     {
-        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA));
+        assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA));
         data = (PacketDataPtr)p;
         flags.set(DYNAMIC_DATA);
     }
@@ -938,12 +923,10 @@ class Packet : public Printable
     void
     deleteData()
     {
-        if (flags.isSet(ARRAY_DATA))
+        if (flags.isSet(DYNAMIC_DATA))
             delete [] data;
-        else if (flags.isSet(DYNAMIC_DATA))
-            delete data;
 
-        flags.clear(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA);
+        flags.clear(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA);
         data = NULL;
     }
 
@@ -952,7 +935,7 @@ class Packet : public Printable
     allocate()
     {
         assert(flags.noneSet(STATIC_DATA|DYNAMIC_DATA));
-        flags.set(DYNAMIC_DATA|ARRAY_DATA);
+        flags.set(DYNAMIC_DATA);
         data = new uint8_t[getSize()];
     }