Small changes:

?? doesn't compile in warn statements
Should have been false, where I had a true.

src/cpu/o3/lsq_impl.hh:
    Apparently you can't have ?? in a warn statement (Something about trigraphs)
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh:
    Forgot to signal atomic mode in snoopProbe

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : c75cb76e193e852284564993440c8ea39e6de426
This commit is contained in:
Ron Dreslinski 2006-10-19 20:18:17 -04:00
parent e34e564f79
commit 210e73f2a2
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View file

@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ LSQ<Impl>::DcachePort::recvTiming(PacketPtr pkt)
}
else {
//else it is a coherence request, maybe you need to do something
warn("Recieved a coherence request (Invalidate??), 03CPU doesn't"
warn("Recieved a coherence request (Invalidate?), 03CPU doesn't"
"update LSQ for these\n");
}
return true;

View file

@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ Tick
Cache<TagStore,Buffering,Coherence>::snoopProbe(PacketPtr &pkt)
{
//Send a atomic (false) invalidate up if the protocol calls for it
coherence->propogateInvalidate(pkt, true);
coherence->propogateInvalidate(pkt, false);
Addr blk_addr = pkt->getAddr() & ~(Addr(blkSize-1));
BlkType *blk = tags->findBlock(pkt);