cache: fix a bug in atomic multilevel snoops
This commit is contained in:
parent
ee6a92863a
commit
1bf944be62
1 changed files with 8 additions and 3 deletions
11
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
vendored
11
src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
vendored
|
@ -1099,6 +1099,12 @@ Cache<TagStore>::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *blk,
|
|||
assert(!(pending_inval && !is_deferred));
|
||||
assert(pkt->isRequest());
|
||||
|
||||
// the packet may get modified if we or a forwarded snooper
|
||||
// responds in atomic mode, so remember a few things about the
|
||||
// original packet up front
|
||||
bool invalidate = pkt->isInvalidate();
|
||||
bool needs_exclusive = pkt->needsExclusive();
|
||||
|
||||
if (forwardSnoops) {
|
||||
// first propagate snoop upward to see if anyone above us wants to
|
||||
// handle it. save & restore packet src since it will get
|
||||
|
@ -1141,10 +1147,9 @@ Cache<TagStore>::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *blk,
|
|||
// and then do it later
|
||||
bool respond = blk->isDirty() && pkt->needsResponse();
|
||||
bool have_exclusive = blk->isWritable();
|
||||
bool invalidate = pkt->isInvalidate();
|
||||
|
||||
if (pkt->isRead() && !pkt->isInvalidate()) {
|
||||
assert(!pkt->needsExclusive());
|
||||
if (pkt->isRead() && !invalidate) {
|
||||
assert(!needs_exclusive);
|
||||
pkt->assertShared();
|
||||
int bits_to_clear = BlkWritable;
|
||||
const bool haveOwnershipState = true; // for now
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue