ruby: fixed memory fetch bug for persistent requests

This commit is contained in:
Brad Beckmann 2010-01-29 20:29:25 -08:00
parent d77a9df3c1
commit 042d5b87a4

View file

@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
// Memory wait states - can block all messages including persistent requests
O_W, desc="transitioning to Owner, waiting for memory write";
L_W, desc="transitioning to Locked, waiting for memory read";
L_O_W, desc="transitioning to Locked, waiting for memory read, could eventually return to O";
L_NO_W, desc="transitioning to Locked, waiting for memory read, eventually return to NO";
DR_L_W, desc="transitioning to Locked underneath a DMA read, waiting for memory data";
NO_W, desc="transitioning to Not Owner, waiting for memory read";
O_DW_W, desc="transitioning to Owner, waiting for memory before DMA ack";
@ -571,6 +572,18 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
}
}
action(qp_queueMemoryForPersistent, "qp", desc="Queue off-chip fetch request") {
enqueue(memQueue_out, MemoryMsg, latency="1") {
out_msg.Address := address;
out_msg.Type := MemoryRequestType:MEMORY_READ;
out_msg.Sender := machineID;
out_msg.OriginalRequestorMachId := persistentTable.findSmallest(address);
out_msg.MessageSize := MessageSizeType:Request_Control;
out_msg.DataBlk := getDirectoryEntry(address).DataBlk;
DEBUG_EXPR(out_msg);
}
}
action(fd_memoryDma, "fd", desc="Queue off-chip fetch request") {
peek(dmaRequestQueue_in, DMARequestMsg) {
enqueue(memQueue_out, MemoryMsg, latency="1") {
@ -868,8 +881,8 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
p_popDmaRequestQueue;
}
transition(O, Lockdown, L_W) {
qf_queueMemoryFetchRequest;
transition(O, Lockdown, L_O_W) {
qp_queueMemoryForPersistent;
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
@ -1059,7 +1072,7 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
j_popIncomingRequestQueue;
}
transition({L, DW_L, DR_L, L_W, DR_L_W}, Lockdown) {
transition({L, DW_L, DR_L, L_O_W, L_NO_W, DR_L_W}, Lockdown) {
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
@ -1089,11 +1102,24 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
transition(L_W, Memory_Data, L) {
transition({L_NO_W, L_O_W}, Memory_Data, L) {
dd_sendDataWithAllTokensToStarver;
l_popMemQueue;
}
transition(L_O_W, Memory_Ack) {
qp_queueMemoryForPersistent;
l_popMemQueue;
}
transition(L_O_W, {Unlockdown, Own_Lock_or_Unlock}, O_W) {
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
transition(L_NO_W, {Unlockdown, Own_Lock_or_Unlock}, NO_W) {
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
transition(DR_L_W, Memory_Data, DR_L) {
dd_sendDataWithAllTokensToStarver;
l_popMemQueue;
@ -1121,7 +1147,11 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
ps_tryIssuingPersistentGETSRequest;
}
transition(O_W, Memory_Ack, O) {
//
// The O_W + Memory_Data > O transistion is confusing, but it can happen if a
// presistent request is issued and resolve before memory returns with data
//
transition(O_W, {Memory_Ack, Memory_Data}, O) {
l_popMemQueue;
}
@ -1130,19 +1160,23 @@ machine(Directory, "Token protocol")
}
// Blocked states
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W, O_DW, NO_DW, NO_DR}, {GETX, GETS}) {
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_O_W, L_NO_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W, O_DW, NO_DW, NO_DR}, {GETX, GETS}) {
z_recycleRequest;
}
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W, O_DW, NO_DW, NO_DR, L, DW_L, DR_L}, {DMA_READ, DMA_WRITE}) {
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_O_W, L_NO_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W, O_DW, NO_DW, NO_DR, L, DW_L, DR_L}, {DMA_READ, DMA_WRITE}) {
y_recycleDmaRequestQueue;
}
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W}, {Data_Owner, Ack_Owner, Tokens}) {
transition({NO_W, O_W, L_O_W, L_NO_W, DR_L_W, O_DW_W, O_DR_W}, {Data_Owner, Ack_Owner, Tokens, Ack_All_Tokens}) {
kz_recycleResponse;
}
transition({NO_W, O_W}, Lockdown, L_W) {
transition(NO_W, Lockdown, L_NO_W) {
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}
transition(O_W, Lockdown, L_O_W) {
l_popIncomingPersistentQueue;
}