MemorySystem: Fix the use of ?: to produce correct results.

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : 31aad7170b35556a4c984f4ebc013137d55d85eb
This commit is contained in:
Ali Saidi 2007-08-12 19:43:54 -04:00
parent 64295b800f
commit 02353a60ee
4 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions

View file

@ -148,10 +148,7 @@ void Bus::occupyBus(PacketPtr pkt)
// The first word will be delivered after the current tick, the delivery
// of the address if any, and one bus cycle to deliver the data
pkt->firstWordTime =
tickNextIdle +
pkt->isRequest() ? clock : 0 +
clock;
pkt->firstWordTime = tickNextIdle + (pkt->isRequest() ? clock : 0) + clock;
//Advance it numCycles bus cycles.
//XXX Should this use the repeated addition trick as well?

View file

@ -736,7 +736,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::handleResponse(PacketPtr pkt)
// If critical word (no offset) return first word time
completion_time = tags->getHitLatency() +
transfer_offset ? pkt->finishTime : pkt->firstWordTime;
(transfer_offset ? pkt->finishTime : pkt->firstWordTime);
assert(!target->pkt->req->isUncacheable());
missLatency[target->pkt->cmdToIndex()][0/*pkt->req->getThreadNum()*/] +=

View file

@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ MSHR::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, Counter _order)
if (targets->needsExclusive || pkt->needsExclusive()) {
// actual target device (typ. PhysicalMemory) will delete the
// packet on reception, so we need to save a copy here
PacketPtr cp_pkt = new Packet(pkt);
PacketPtr cp_pkt = new Packet(pkt, true);
targets->add(cp_pkt, curTick, _order, false);
++ntargets;

View file

@ -95,6 +95,7 @@ void
SimpleTimingPort::schedSendTiming(PacketPtr pkt, Tick when)
{
assert(when > curTick);
assert(when < curTick + Clock::Int::ms);
// Nothing is on the list: add it and schedule an event
if (transmitList.empty() || when < transmitList.front().tick) {