removed spow(x, 0); calls, I did them for consistency's sake, but it should be rather obvious how the scaling works anyways
This commit is contained in:
parent
85c9ebf2fc
commit
2cd1609770
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
6
layout.c
6
layout.c
|
@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ tile(void) {
|
|||
sum += spow(vratio, i);
|
||||
mscale = wah / sum;
|
||||
if(vratio >= 1)
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, 0));
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > mscale;
|
||||
else
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, n - 1));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ tile(void) {
|
|||
sum += spow(vratio, i);
|
||||
sscale = wah / sum;
|
||||
if(vratio >= 1) {
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, 0));
|
||||
smaxtile = bh > (sscale * spow(vratio, 0));
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > mscale;
|
||||
smaxtile = bh > sscale;
|
||||
}
|
||||
else {
|
||||
mmaxtile = bh > (mscale * spow(vratio, nmaster - 1));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue