Not sure if we ever really needed this considering that we work on open
source projects, where we need only push the branch from which we raise
the MR. Pretty much the same for current client work as well. Are tags
ever required for such scenario?.
While we dropped diffconflicts earlier and switch to vanilla vimdiff,
two way merges are definitely better than three way merges. 3 way merge
as in gina or vimdiff is extremely confusing except for may be the
simplest of merge conflicts.
conflict-marker and diffconflicts should let us handle all cases.
Automatically delete remote tracking local branches that have been
removed from remote. This makes pruning references part of our
normal work flow.
Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
The conflict markers plugin is what we have been using all the time and
is useful even without resorting to merge tool. Drop the DiffConflicts
plugin and use vimdiff as the merge tool if at all we need to resort to
a full 3 way merge view.
Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
diff3 as conflict style was required by vim-mergetool. It is not
required by the current plugins we are using.
Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
Also add the conflict-marker plugin. This should also be useful
for doing rebases and resolving conflicts. Might drop one later
if one of them serves all the purposes in all cases.
While at it, add unimpaired style bindings for moving between
tabs. This is required since :DiffConflictsShowHistory opens
a new tab and default tab navigation bindings gt/gT at least
are binded to something else in python.
Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
